Editorial & verification policy
Students often make time-sensitive decisions based on exam and admission information. Our publishing process should make it clear where information came from and when it was checked.
Sources and verification
- Use the relevant board, university, exam authority or government portal as the primary source for dates, eligibility, fees and instructions.
- Read the full official notice or prospectus instead of relying only on a social-media graphic or another article.
- Keep the source link with the draft and check that it opens the intended official page.
- Clearly label general guidance, analysis and examples so they are not mistaken for official notices.
Updates and corrections
When an official authority changes a schedule or requirement, update the article and explain the material change. Include a last-checked date only after the source has actually been reviewed. Make a clear correction when previously published information is wrong. To report a problem, use the contact page.
Originality and useful context
Our articles should do more than rewrite a notice. Add useful context such as eligibility explanations, step-by-step instructions, document checklists, common mistakes, FAQs and relevant next steps. Do not copy the text or images of other publishers without permission.
Use of AI and editing tools
Writing and research tools may assist drafting, but an editor should verify key factual claims and official links before publication. Do not automatically publish large numbers of pages that add little original value.